RWAs On-Chain and the “Yield Corridor”: How Tokenized Treasury Funds Re-Anchor DeFi Yield Benchmarks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/m88kqv86Keywords:
Tokenized Treasuries, Decentralized Finance, Yield Benchmarks, Money-market FundsAbstract
Real world asset tokenization (RWA) introduces programmable finance on chain tools to the market, while bringing cash like returns. This paper focuses on token treasury bond funds to explore whether they are re anchoring the yield benchmark of decentralized finance (DeFi). The key entry point of the study is to build a de facto "interest rate corridor", which is formed by DeFi's stable monetary loan interest rate around the volatility of token treasury bond yield. The research results show that due to the widespread risk exposure in the tokenized currency market, DeFi USD returns have gradually converged towards short-term interest rate benchmarks. What is more noteworthy is that its stay time in the narrow corridor centered on the yield of token treasury bond is significantly prolonged. This re anchoring effect not only narrows the long-standing divergence between cryptocurrency native interest rates and monetary policy benchmarks, but also reshapes the incentive mechanism for liquidity supply, and further tightens the integration channels between on chain markets and traditional fixed income markets on this basis.
References
[1]Aldasoro, I., Cornelli, G., Minesso, M. F., Gambacorta, L., & Habib, M. M. (2025). Stablecoins, money market funds and monetary policy. Economics Letters, 247, 112203.
[2]Barthélemy, J., Delaneau, C., Martignon, T., Nguyen, B., Pallum, M. R., & Zitan, S. T. (2024). Interest rates in decentralised finance.
[3]Bertomeu, J., Martin, X., & Sall, I. (2024). Measuring DeFi risk. Finance Research Letters, 63, 105321.
[4]Kumar, R., Sharma, S. K., Kishor, K., & Devi, P. (2025). Decentralized finance evolution: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101209.
[5]Puschmann, T., & Huang-Sui, M. (2024). A taxonomy for decentralized finance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, 103083.
[6]Dionysopoulos, L., & Urquhart, A. (2024). 10 years of stablecoins: Their impact, what we know, and future research directions. Economics Letters, 244, 111939.
[7]Fernandez-Mejia, J. (2024). Extremely stablecoins. Finance Research Letters, 63, 105268.
[8]Gregory, G., Alessio, C., Vito, L., & Patrice, S. (2024). Break a peg! A study of stablecoin co-instability. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103608.
[9]de l’Etang, F. (2024). Dollar’s role in institutional and media impact on stablecoins. Finance Research Letters, 61, 104999.
[10]Hui, C. H., Wong, A., & Lo, C. F. (2025). Stablecoin price dynamics under a peg-stabilising mechanism. Journal of International Money and Finance, 152, 103280.
[11]Tanveer, U., Ishaq, S., & Hoang, T. G. (2025). Tokenized assets in a decentralized economy: Balancing efficiency, value, and risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 282, 109554.
[12]Zhang, Y., Gong, B., & Zhou, P. (2024). Centralized use of decentralized technology: Tokenization of currencies and assets. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 71, 15-25.
[13]Kaisto, J., Juutilainen, T., & Kauranen, J. (2024). Non-fungible tokens, tokenization, and ownership. Computer Law & Security Review, 54, 105996.
[14]Dunbar, K., Treku, D. N., & Owusu-Amoako, J. (2025). The decentralization enigma in DeFi: Impact of US federal funds rate changes. The British Accounting Review, 101613.
[15]Aharon, D. Y., Ali, S., & Brahim, M. (2024). Connectedness at extremes between real estate tokens and real estate stocks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103425.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sen Wang (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.